Accessibility Notice
Digital Accessibility
An accessible website is one that enables people with disabilities to reach its content and features without difficulty.
An accessible website makes it possible, for example, to:
- Navigate using a screen reader and/or a braille display (commonly used by blind and visually impaired users).
- Personalise the way the website is displayed according to individual needs (such as enlarging or reducing text size, adjusting colours, and more).
- Browse the site without using a mouse (entirely via keyboard, touchscreen, voice control, or any other adapted device).
To achieve this, the website must comply with the relevant accessibility standards during its development and throughout its updates.
Accessibility statement
Les Thermes Saint-Gervais Mont Blanc is committed to ensuring that its websites (internet, intranet and extranet), software solutions, mobile applications and digital public terminals are accessible, in accordance with Article 47 of Act no. 2005-102 of 11 February 2005.
This accessibility statement applies to the website: https://thermes-saint-gervais.com/en/.
Compliance Status
The Thermes de Saint-Gervais website is partially compliant with the General Accessibility Improvement Framework (RGAA 4.1).
The non-compliances are listed below.
Non-accessible Content
Details of Non-compliances
Criterion 1.1
Does each information-bearing image have a text alternative?
Criterion 1.2
Are decorative images correctly ignored by assistive technologies?
Criterion 1.3
For each information-bearing image with a text alternative, is the alternative relevant (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 1.6
Where necessary, does each information-bearing image have a detailed description?
Criterion 1.9
Where required, is each image caption correctly linked to its corresponding image?
Criterion 2.2
For each inline frame with a title, is this title relevant?
Criterion 3.2
On every web page, is the contrast between text and background colour sufficiently high (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 3.3
On every web page, are the colours used in interface components or graphical elements conveying information sufficiently contrasted (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 4.5
Does each pre-recorded time-based media have synchronised audio description where necessary (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 6.1
Is each link explicit (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 7.1
Where necessary, is each script compatible with assistive technologies?
Criterion 7.3
Is every script operable via both keyboard and pointing devices (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 8.2
For each web page, is the generated source code valid according to the specified document type?
Criterion 8.6
For each web page with a page title, is this title relevant?
Criterion 8.7
On each web page, is every language change indicated in the source code (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 8.9
On each web page, are tags used strictly for their semantic purpose, and not solely for presentation?
Criterion 9.1
On every web page, is information structured using appropriate headings?
Criterion 9.2
On each web page, is the document structure consistent (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 9.3
On every web page, is each list correctly structured?
Criterion 9.4
On every web page, is each quotation correctly marked up?
Criterion 10.1
Are style sheets used on the website to control the presentation of information?
Criterion 10.5
On each web page, are CSS declarations for background and text colours used correctly?
Criterion 10.7
On each web page, is the focus indicator visible for every element receiving focus?
Criterion 10.12
On each web page, can users adjust text spacing properties without loss of content or functionality (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 10.13
On each web page, are additional contents that appear on focus or hover controllable by the user (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 11.2
Is each label associated with a form field relevant (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 11.10
In each form, is input validation used appropriately (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 11.11
In each form, is input validation accompanied, where possible, by suggestions to help users correct errors?
Criterion 12.1
Does each set of pages offer at least two different navigation systems (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 12.7
On each web page, is there a skip link or quick access link to the main content (except in specific cases)?
Criterion 12.8
On each web page, is the tab order coherent?
Criterion 13.3
On each web page, does every downloadable office document have an accessible version where necessary (except in specific cases)?
Technologies Used to Build the Website
HTML5
CSS
SVG
JavaScript
ARIA
Testing Environment
Content rendering checks were carried out using the combinations defined in the RGAA 4.1 reference base, with the following versions:
Firefox 98
NVDA 2021.3
JAWS 2020
Android TalkBack 12 + Chrome 99
Accessibility Evaluation Tools
Colour Contrast Analyser
Firefox Developer Tools
Web Developer Extension
Feedback and Contact
If you are unable to access any content or service, you may contact the website manager to be directed to an accessible alternative or to receive the information in another format.
Contact Les Thermes Saint-Gervais
Appeal Procedures
Use this procedure in the following situation:
You have notified the website manager of an accessibility issue preventing you from accessing content or a service, and you have not received a satisfactory response.
- Send a message to the Defender of Rights.
- Contact the regional delegate of the Defender of Rights.
- Send a letter by post (free of charge, no stamp required):
DĂ©fenseur des droits
Libre réponse 71120
75342 Paris CEDEX 07